Crooker v. Knudsen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California; Benj. F. Bledsoe, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Knudsen against Edwin R. Crooker and others, whose arrest was ordered. Defendants’ motion to vacate the order of arrest was denied, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiffs in error to recover damages caused by the alleged fraudulent practices of the plaintiffs in error, and in her complaint she prayed that an order of arrest be issued against the plaintiffs in error, and each of them, under sections 479, 480, and 481 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the state of California. The court below signed an order for the arrest of the plaintiffs in error, and directed that they be held in custody and for bail in the sum of $10,000 each for Edwin R. Crooker and W. P. Ellis, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Leitensdorfer v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Loeber v. SchroederSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Wallace G. West and Claudia M. West v. Charles S. Zurhorst and Susan M. ZurhorstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. MarquetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Grand Trunk Western R. v. McHieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- McColgan v. LinekerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.