Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Jaeger Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1924No. 6520PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

This action was commenced by defendant in error in the district court of Douglas county, Kan., against Olson & Johnson Company, a corporation, Olson-Magee Company (the same corporation under a different name), and plaintiff in error, likewise a corporation, to recover for certain material furnished by defendant in error to Olson & Johnson Company and its successor, Olson-Magee Company (hereafter called the contractor); the same being used in the construction of or addition to a certain building at the Kansas State University, Lawrence, Kan. Plaintiff in error was surety…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Winkle Terra Cotta Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. (PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API