Legal Opinion
In Re Max A. Gulack
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 30, 1983No. Appeal 82-580PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Appeals sustaining the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-4 and 6 of application serial No. 935,183, filed August 18, 1978, entitled “Educational and Recreational Mathematical Device in the Form of a Band, Ring or Concentric Rings.” We reverse.
I
The stated object of the disclosed invention is to exploit certain arithmetic properties of all prime numbers larger than 5, P,1 to create the semblance of magic or to educate with respect to intriguing aspects of number theory.
A
T…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Application of Paul J. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eon Labels, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Cfmt, Inc. And Cfm Technologies, Inc. v. Yieldup International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.