MacNeill v. Wertz
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first question for determination is whether or not, by the amendment filed after the previous decision of this court, the petition then alleges that the- appointment of Mrs. Wertz by the judge of the superior court was by recommendation of the grand jury in accordance with the act approved August 16, 1913 (Ga. L. 1913, p. 112; Code, § 27-2703). In order to determine whether the position held 4y Mrs. Wertz was provided by recommendation of the grand juTy, it becomes necessary to enumerate their various recommendations as contained in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Freeney v. PapeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Massenburg v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Haney v. Commissioners of Bartow CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Culberson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Tucker v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.