Legal Opinion

England v. Board of Canvassers

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1926No. 5890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, JudgIe:

Congressman Taylor and General E. T. England were opposing and only candidates for the house of representatives from the 6th Congressional District at the general election November 2, 1926. The returns indicated England’s election, and Taylor asked for and was accorded a recount in all of the counties comprising the district which includes Raleigh County. The Raleigh County board of canvassers composed of respondents Lively, Cole and Arthur, began the recount on November loth, representatives of both candidates being present. It appears to have been agreed to by the parties and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dent v. Board of CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chenowith v. Commissioners of Randolph CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State Ex Rel. Vandelinde v. McComasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bumgardner v. MillsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. McKown v. Board of CanvassersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Zickefoose v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API