Legal Opinion

Dakota Pike-Grant v. Jeffrey Alan Grant

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2014No. 13-0277PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a restricted appeal from a trial court’s divorce decree that contains two conflicting recitals. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure allow a party who did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the judgment to file a restricted appeal, which has a more lenient filing deadline than a traditional appeal. Tex.R.App. P. 30.. Here, the first recital in the divorce decree indicates the hearing occurred in November 2011 and that the petitioner attended the hearing, which — if correct— would foreclose her restricted appeal. But another recital indicates the hearing occurred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. McAllen Medical Center, Inc. v. CortezTexas Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Ex parte VegaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. In re the Expunction of M.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Ex Parte E.M.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
  4. Southwest Warren, Inc. and Thomas Eugene McCain v. Theresa CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. 2012 Properties, LLC v. Garland Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API