Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Akins

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 17, 1980No. Civ. 2274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Circuit Court of Houston County denied the insurance company's Rule 60 (b)(1), ARCP, motion. The insurance company appeals.

The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60 (b)(1) motion. We find no such abuse of discretion requiring reversal and affirm.

The record reveals the following pertinent information:

The trial court divorced Mr. and Mrs. Akins. However, the trial court retained jurisdiction of a portion of the divorce controversy. The purpose of the trial court's action was to determine certain aspects of two insurance policies. Pursuant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallups v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Marsh v. MarshCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. McSween v. McSweenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Halstead v. HalsteadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BOLES, BY & THROUGH BOLES v. Hooper & McDonald, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Hilbish v. HilbishCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Young v. Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. Mitchell v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API