Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mitchell v. Campbell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 12, 2016No. 2150003Published

1DissentThomas, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I cannot agree that the notice of appeal filed by Aaron Christopher Mitchell (“the husband”) was untimely filed. Because, based on my reading of the motion, I would construe the husband’s July 2, 2015, motion as a Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion, I con-elude that the husband’s appeal was timely filed from the denial of that motion.

The husband’s July 2, 2015, motion directed to the trial court’s May 30, 2015, default judgment divorcing him from Shauna Lee Campbell (“the wife”) was filed more than 30 days after the entry of the judgment.2 Thus, the husband’s motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ex Parte LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Union Springs Telephone Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API