Legal Opinion

State v. Cobb

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 2003No. C-020757 and C-020773PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, James E. Cobb, was tried and convicted of domestic violence in violation of R.C. 2919.25. The trial court also found him guilty of violating a protection order under R.C. 2919.27, after he pleaded no contest. On appeal, he raises five assignments of error. His first assignment of error challenges the trial court’s denial of his Crim.R. 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal made after the state’s ease-in-chief. His second assignment challenges the weight of the evidence concerning the protection-order conviction. His third assignment challenges the sufficiency…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ParraOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. EichelbrennerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. Berry, Ca2006-11-133 (12-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API