Westland v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Bill to foreclose a builders’ lien; brought to the City Court of tlie city of Hartford and heard before Bennett, J. Bill dismissed, and motion for a new trial by the petitioner. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is a petition to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The certificate of lien states that the petitioner commenced rendering services and furnishing materials on the 19th day of October, 1878, and ceased so to do on the 9th day of December following. The certificate is dated February 7th, 1879, and the court below found that it was not made and .filed with the town clerk within sixty days after the petitioner had ceased to furnish materials and perform services. On the trial however the petitioner offered evidence to prove that the date in the certificate, December 9tli, 1878, was so entered by…
2Cited by11 opinions
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. BorsukSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- First Constitution Bank v. Harbor Village Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Tramonte v. WilensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.