Clendenning v. Parker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
This is an action involving the title and possession of certain real property, brought by plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Charlotte Haley, sometimes known as Charlotte Parker, deceased, against D. E. Parker, who claims as the husband of said deceased.
The facts herein, as shown by the bill of exceptions, are that on November 22, 1915, Michael Haley and decedent were married in the city of Seattle, state of Washington, where they resided as husband and wife until some time in the latter part of September, 1916, at which time the wife went to the city of Los Angeles, California. At…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Cartwright v. McGownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Lee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.