Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Robert J. Barnabei Contracting, LLC v. Greater Hartford Jewish Community Center, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 2011No. AC 31679Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFlynn, J.

Two cardinal principles of law inform our review of contracts. One is that courts will not rewrite a contractual provision unwisely made by a party. Crews v. Crews, 295 Conn. 153, 173, 989 A.2d 1060 (2010). The other is that effect must be given, to the extent possible, to all provisions of an agreement. Honulik v. Greenwich, 293 Conn. 698, 711, 980 A.2d 880 (2009); Detels v. Detels, 79 Conn. App. 467, 472, 830 A.2d 381 (2003). I agree with the majority’s opinion affirming the denial of the plaintiffs claim for $9600 in extras for the more expensive kind of piling required to be installed. I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API