Legal Opinion
Worth v. Universal Pictures, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 23, 1997No. CV 97-1410 LGB (JGX)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I.INTRODUCTION
BAIRD, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Central District of California Local Civil Rule 7.11, the Court dispensed with oral argument on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand and took it under submission. Having reviewed all pertinent papers on file and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs Motion.
II.FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Howard Worth and Tony Anthony (“Plaintiffs”) bring this claim against Universal Pictures 1 a division of Universal Studios, Inc.; f/k/a MCA, Inc.; and Does 1 through 30 for the unauthorized use of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Idema v. Dreamworks, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Firoozye v. Earthlink NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- A Slice of Pie Productions, LLC v. Wayans Bros. EntertainmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Fischer v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.