Legal Opinion
Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 9, 2014No. 13-3005PublishedCited by 379 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Some readers of our opinions may be familiar with paintball, a type of war game in which the players shoot charges of paint at one another. Paintballs, it turns out, are not the only kind of nonlethal projectile that can be used in this way. Our case concerns a more serious product, known to Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems (Advanced Tactical) by the name PepperBall (a ball filled with a pepper-spray-like irritant). Police departments, private security firms, and comparable organizations are the primary consumers of these items. This is a trademark infringement action,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by379 opinions
- Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Bank of Am. N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Tai Matlin v. Spin Master Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Anthony Fidrych v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
374 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.