United States v. Roman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
Defendant Martin Roman pro se moves under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 and 36, and 28 U.S.C. § 2255, for “an order allowing him credit on his sentence for that time spent on bail from the time of his arrest on April 22, 1986 until May 3, 1988, the date of his post conviction imprisonment.” Roman previously moved, while represented by counsel, to reduce his sentence pursuant to Rule 35, but made no mention of his present grounds for seeking relief. His prior Rule 35 motion was denied by this Court by order dated February 1, 1990. Nor did he raise this issue when appealing this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Martin RomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lisa InsleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Bernard GelbCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Irwin A. SchiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Martin RomanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tinsley v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992