Legal Opinion

Nichols v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 16, 2007No. 05-6452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Thomas Albert Nichols (“Nichols”) appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Nichols argues that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to challenge enhancements to his Guidelines range. Nichols argues that, based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his counsel should have raised a Sixth Amendment challenge to the sentencing enhancements, even though Nichols was sentenced in 2002, more than two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. United States v. DuvalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. Cvijetinovic v. EberlinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API