Legal Opinion

Doonan v. Clark, No. Cv95 0148729 S (Oct. 21, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 21, 1997No. CV95 0148729 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#137) CT Page 10360 Defendant Snappy Car Rental has sought summary judgment in a personal injury action wherein Snappy is said to be the owner of the vehicle operated by co-defendant Clark. See, C.G.S. §14-154a. In support of said motion, Snappy offers factual matter in contravention of the statutory presumption contained in C.G.S. § 52-183. As a result, the issue presented is essentially whether tension between the presumption and defense evidence contravening…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Pedevillano v. BryonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Masse v. JonahConnecticut Superior Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API