Legal Opinion
State v. Wicke
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 2, 1978No. 2019-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.
Ernest G. Wicke appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether CrR 6.1(a) requires a written waiver of a jury in a superior court trial de novo where the defendant was originally charged by a complaint in district court.
Ernest Wicke was charged by complaint in Spokane District Court with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (hereafter DWI). He was found guilty and sentenced to 90 days in jail. An appeal was taken, and after a trial de novo, he was convicted. The waiver of jury was not in writing, but was by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- City of Seattle v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re the Personal Restraint of ReeseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State ex rel. McEver v. Yakima County District CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979