Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Village of Oregon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

An order for the remission of damages or a new trial involves exercise of the trial court’s discretion. Such an order will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record shows the court abused its discretion. Blong v. Ed. Schuster & Co. (1956), 274 Wis. 237, 79 N. W. (2d) 820; Hale v. Schultz (1936), 223 Wis. 285, 270 N. W. 46. The trial court may set aside a verdict and order a new trial when the evidence warrants its conclusion that the jury disregarded its instructions and the evidence did not sustain the verdict. Fulkerson v. Risberg (1948), 253 Wis. 466, 34 N. W. (2d) 662.

Much of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Makowski v. EhlenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Thayer v. Federal Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Blong v. Ed. Schuster & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sohns v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Micro-Managers, Inc. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  3. Burmeister v. VondrachekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Adelmeyer v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Wallace v. CrilleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API