Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Holcomb

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

M-ror from Miami District Court. Action to recover damages for bodily injuries. The facts are fully stated in the opinion. Verdict for the plaintiff Holcomb, at the February term, 1888, for $5,000 damages. New trial denied, and judgment given for the plaintiff. The defendant Company comes to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

Catherine A. Holcomb brought her action against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned, as she alleges, by the negligent, careless and unskillful management of the train upon which she was a passenger. These personal injuries consisted in a fracture of the upper part of the thigh bone, and other serious wounds, caused by the sudden and violent jerking of the car in which she was riding as it started from the station, throwing her with great violence out of her seat and upon the floor, thus producing the injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Steamboat New World v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Topeka City Railway Co. v. HiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Suttle v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RalstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API