Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Blodgett

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 25, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this accounting proceeding objections and supplemental objections were filed to the account of the trustees by Stephen W. Blodgett which, in general, attack the legality of an investment made by the trustees in the sum of $15,000 in the form of a mortgage participation authorized by former section 188 of the Banking Law (now section 100-b). Claim was made that the amount of the mortgage was excessive and beyond the statutory limit of the value of the real property as to the placement of mortgages. Other grounds of alleged negligence were charged. It was •further contended that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Fisher v. FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Minehan v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Slater v. SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Slater v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GoldstickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of SalomonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of AmusoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API