Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Salomon
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 2, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dodd, J.,
Acting Surrogate. The facts in this proceeding, whereas submitted on affidavits instead of upon a stipulation, are undisputed in any material aspect. Under the terms of the trust, the trustee was restricted to investment in government securities and “ bonds secured by first mortgage on real estate within the City of New York and guaranteed by a Title Company.” In fact, on June 21, 1932, it invested in a bond and mortgage on property located at 271 Cedarhurst avenue, Cedarhurst, Long Island, which is not within the city. This investment has proved unfortunate. The sole issue presented…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fisher v. FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In Re the Estate of SchoenewergNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Slater v. SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Slater v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re the Estate of TyrrellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of SchroderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Accounting of GilchristNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- In re the Estate of BaruchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of AmusoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959