Legal Opinion

Carlin v. Brackett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin. county, Hicks, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.1

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover the value of certain goods and chattels, alleged to have been unlawfully converted by defendant, and in which plaintiff claims to have had a special property. Among the defences interposed was that of a judgment in the district court for Hennepin county against the plaintiff upon the merits of the controversy, and for the same cause of action set forth in the complaint herein. Upon the trial in the court below said defence was sustained, a verdict found for defendant, and from an order refusing a new trial the plaintiff appeals.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Thomas v. JoslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Frye v. MileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Lamb v. McConkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. Swanson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Parrotte v. DrydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API