State v. Peraza
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Toomey, Judge:
¶1 Robert Alonzo Peraza appeals his conviction of four counts of sodomy on a child (Child). Peraza's trial was continued twice because the State did not provide all relevant discovery in time for defense counsel to prepare a defense and to procure an expert witness for impeachment purposes. Then, thirty-two days before trial, the State filed a notice of expert witness to rebut Peraza's anticipated defense. The notice disclosed the name and address of the expert (Expert), her curriculum vitae, a one-sentence description of the nature of her testimony, and a list of citations to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Larry FlyntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. PerazaUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. PerazaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020