State v. Harvey
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MORTENSEN, Judge:
¶1 A police officer (Officer) testified at trial, based on information he received in his police training, about the human body's average rate of elimination of alcohol-the "burn-off rate." Randy Lynn Harvey, who was standing trial for driving under the influence (DUI), objected for lack of foundation. The district court overruled the objection, and a jury found Harvey guilty. Harvey subsequently filed a motion for a new trial, asserting that Officer gave expert testimony as a lay witness. The district court denied the motion. Harvey appeals, and we reverse.
BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Figueroa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LeechCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. BowdreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. FraughtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- American Fork City v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026