Legal Opinion

State v. Harvey

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 20, 2019No. 20170733-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 A police officer (Officer) testified at trial, based on information he received in his police training, about the human body's average rate of elimination of alcohol-the "burn-off rate." Randy Lynn Harvey, who was standing trial for driving under the influence (DUI), objected for lack of foundation. The district court overruled the objection, and a jury found Harvey guilty. Harvey subsequently filed a motion for a new trial, asserting that Officer gave expert testimony as a lay witness. The district court denied the motion. Harvey appeals, and we reverse.

BACKGROUND

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Figueroa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. State v. ReeceUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LeechCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. State v. BowdreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  3. State v. FraughtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. American Fork City v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API