Legal Opinion
Lyndall Rhoden v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1995No. 93-55844PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
Lyndall Rhoden brought this action for false arrest and imprisonment against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) after being detained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) for six days without a hearing upon his return to California from a trip to Jamaica. The district court granted summary judgment for the government. Rhoden appeals.
I
Lyndall Rhoden has been a lawful permanent resident of the United States since 1968. In October 1986, Rhoden returned to California from a one-week trip to Jamaica to attend his grandmother’s funeral. After questioning by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Rollin Paul Goodman, in His Individual Capacity v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Swanson v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Alvarez-Machain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.