Legal Opinion
David Bordetsky v. JAK Realty Trust
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 9, 2017No. Docket: Ken-16-233PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] David Bordetsky appeals from a judgment in favor of JAK Realty Trust entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Mullen, J.) after a nonjury trial on Bordetsky’s foreclosure complaint. Bor-detsky argues that the court erred by applying the requirements for a notice of default and right to cure contained in 14 M.R.S. § 6111 (2012) 1 to his attempt to foreclose. We agree and vacate the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] On October 3,2013, Bordetsky filed a complaint for foreclosure against the Trust, alleging that on April 13, 2009, Gregory O’Halloran — as trustee of the Trust — executed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of American, N.A. v. Scott A. GreenleafSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- American Protection Insurance v. Acadia Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Chase Home Finance LLC v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Coastal Ventures v. Alsham Plaza, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- John A. Thurston v. Jenny G. GalvinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kirby v. 21ST Mortg. Corp. (In re Kirby)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2019
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. EddinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Jesse S. Eddins Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Lisa BerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Kirby v. 21st Mortg. Corp. (In re Kirby)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.