Legal Opinion
Sorokach v. Trusewich
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
35 N.J. Super. 86 (1955)
113 A.2d 194
ROSE SOROKACH, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER SOROKACH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM TRUSEWICH, ET AL., CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS ARROW CLOTHING COMPANY AND AS ARROW COAT & SUIT CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 21, 1955.
Decided April 5, 1955.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Leopold Frankel argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Mr. Henry L. Janowski, attorney).
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- D., L. & WR CO. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Turnley v. City of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Central R.R. Co. v. Thayer-MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dworman v. Borough of Tinton FallsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
- Bostian v. Franklin State BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Daly v. P.D. George Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- RCA Corp. v. East Windsor TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
- St. George v. GrisafeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.