Legal Opinion

Ae Ae v. American Samoa Government

High Court of American Samoa

Decided June 20, 2000No. CA No. 30-99Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs in this case,.Muavaefa'atasi Ae Ae Jr. (“Muavaefa'atasi”) and Eugene Paul Bailey (“Bailey”), originally sued numerous owners and operators of poker machines in addition to the governmental defendants still involved. However, subsequent to our denial of plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, plaintiffs dismissed the suit against all private defendants, leaving only a suit for declaratory relief against the two governmental defendants American Samoa Government and Governor Tauese P.F. Sunia (collectively “ASG”). This raised concerns of whether a justiciable cáse or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API