Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Vazquez

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 3, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtByrnes, J.

This is a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment levied upon the individual property, consisting of a bank account, of a member of a partnership.

It is necessary to determine whether the property of an individual partner may be attached in an action based upon a partnership debt, arising out of an alleged contractual obligation oí the partners. The obligation of the partners in such case is joint, not joint and several. (Partnership Law, § 26, subd. 2.) It was the same at common law. (Seligman v. Friedlander, 199 N. Y. 373, 376.) Nevertheless joint creditors may at law satisfy an execution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Saunders v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Meech v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. In re SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Bayer v. LovelaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Itc Entertainment, Limited v. Nelson Film Partners and Frank MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Patrikes v. J. C. H. Service Stations, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  3. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Greidinger v. HoffbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API