Legal Opinion

Greidinger v. Hoffberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 14, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Nunez and Lynch, JJ.; Lupiano, J., dissents in part in a memorandum and Capozzoli, J., concurs in the dissenting memorandum in a separate memorandum, as follows: Lupiano, J., (dissenting in part). Plaintiffs B. Bernard Greidinger and Jerry B. Klein commenced an action against defendants Samuel I. Hoffberg, Abraham Oberfest, Henry M. Burger and Stanley G. Berger, hereinafter referred to as HOB&B, and against defendants Arthur G. Cohen and Arthur N.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Caplan v. CaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Mercury Machine Importing Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. People v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midwood Development Corp. v. K 12th AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Cohen v. Akabas & CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API