Winchester Water Works Company v. Holliday
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Drury, Commissioner
Affirming.
Various farmers sued this water company for damages done to their farms by a flood of water cast upon them by the breaking of what is, in this record, referred to as a flash dam belonging to the water company. To save costs it was agreed that all of them might join in one action. They did so, all the cases were heard together, and judgments against the water company were r¿covered as follows:
Lewis Holliday, $240.
A._C. Clark, $183-50.
Elizabeth W. Quisenberry, $5-62.50.
Robert L. Quisenberry, $786.
C. N. Royalty, $696.
The water company has made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smick's Admr. v. Beswick's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Steinke v. North Vernon Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Everett v. Hydraulic Flume Tunnel Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Randall v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Inland Steel Co. v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Mayes v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.