Legal Opinion

Pilcher & Dillon v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1924No. 14266PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “A ratification may be expressed or implied from the acts or silence of the principal.” Civil Code (1910), § 3591. Where a cotton factor has disobeyed instructions, by refusing to sell cotton belonging to his principal, it is the duty of the principal upon being informed of the fact, either to affirm the act of the principal or to dissent therefrom. “The agent must act within the authority granted to him, reasonably interpreted; if he exceeds or violates his instructions, he does it at his own risk, the principal having the privilege of affirming or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matthews v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. N. Owsley & Son v. WoolhopterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Bray & Brother v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. McLendon v. Wilson, Callaway & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  5. Palmer v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Tucker & PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Thompson v. Neely & WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Graham v. John Flannery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Hall v. VannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Kohlmeyer v. LightfootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API