Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Neely & Wilcox
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 23, 1924No. 15060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
Neely & Wilcox, cotton factors, after a sale of cotton stored by their customer, S. A. Thompson, and crediting the proceeds upon his notes which had been given for advances, sued him on the notes for the balance, — $4,743.88. He pleaded that as to certain lots the sale was in violation of a special agreement by *132the terms of which the factors would not sell without instructions, so long as he kept the cotton properly margined, which he did; and that, the price having advanced, he was damaged in a sum in excess of the balance sued for, which damage he would recoup'. At the close of the evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dixon v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Whitley v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Strong v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Smith v. Holbrook, Glazier & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dobbs v. Titan Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Napier v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Burke County Board of Education v. RaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Kytle v. KytleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Thomas Register of American Manufacturers, Inc. v. Proto Systems Electronic Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.