State v. Rollinger

WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant appeals from the judgment entered after she pleaded guilty both to a charge of passing a no-account check and to a charge of being a habitual offender. She contends that the trial court erred in that it unconstitutionally included a 1975 order of suspension of imposition of sentence in determining the number of her prior felonies for purposes of sentencing her for the present felony pursuant to the provisions of SDCL 22-7-8. * We affirm.

In January of 1975 appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of issuing a no-account check. Imposition of sentence was suspended.…