Commonwealth v. Grady
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The question presented by this appeal is whether the legislature’s addition of a recidivist section to the “drunk driving law,” 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(e)(l)(ii), 1 is unconstitutional as a violation of the proscriptions against ex post facto laws found in Art. 1, § 10 of the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 17 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We hold that the amendment is constitutional.
The facts are simply stated. In November, 1976, Donald Grady entered a guilty plea to driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Section 1037 of the Motor Vehicle Code of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.