Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grady

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1984No. 339PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the legislature’s addition of a recidivist section to the “drunk driving law,” 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(e)(l)(ii), 1 is unconstitutional as a violation of the proscriptions against ex post facto laws found in Art. 1, § 10 of the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 17 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. We hold that the amendment is constitutional.

The facts are simply stated. In November, 1976, Donald Grady entered a guilty plea to driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Section 1037 of the Motor Vehicle Code of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API