Legal Opinion

Ford v. Bennacka

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1990No. D010534PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Plaintiff Wayne N. Ford appeals a judgment by special verdict favoring defendants Frank J. and Jason Bennacka (Bennacka) on Ford’s personal injury complaint for negligence, negligent supervision and negligent entrustment involving a motorcycle accident. Ford contends the superior court should have granted a new trial on the ground of asserted jury misconduct. We affirm the judgment.

I

Superior Court Proceedings

Alleging he suffered personal injuries in a motorcycle accident, Ford sued Bennacka for negligence, negligent supervision, and negligent entrustment. Answering Ford’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mesecher v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Smoketree-Lake Murray, Ltd. v. Mills Concrete Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Sarti v. Salt Creek Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Maxwell v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Bly-Magee v. Budget Rent-A-Car Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API