Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1920No. 5954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

appeal is from a forfeited bond judgment. The record is before us without briefs being filed either in this court or in the trial court as required by law. The rule has been laid down uniformly that appeals from judgments on forfeited bail bonds will be dismissed where no briefs, as required by Rule No. 102 of the district and county courts, and Rule 29 of the Civil Courts of Appeals, have been filed in the court below nor in the Court of Criminal Appeals. Frost v. State, 57 S. W. Rep., 669; Heiman v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 480; Thetford v. State, 169 S. W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Heiman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Mattie Jay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Belton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Pettis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API