Legal Opinion

United States v. Rea Lyn Segal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1977No. 75-3297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

549 F.2d 1293

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Rea Lyn SEGAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75-3297.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1977.

William M. Goodman, Asst. Federal Public Defender (argued), of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Malcolm Stuart Segal, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

1

Segal pleaded guilty to the fraudulent use of a fictitious name and address in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1342 and was placed on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (HC) Calmese v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (PC) Spence v. KaurDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. (PC) Valdez v. PickettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API