Legal Opinion
In Re Mallinckrodt, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided August 14, 2008No. 09-08-227 CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This discovery dispute arises from a lawsuit brought by Paul Strother’s estate (“Strother”) against Paul’s employers and their suppliers of benzene-containing products. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus sought by relators.
Background
According to Strother’s Original Petition, filed in March 2007, Paul worked as a laboratory technician for four different employers between 1943 and 1983. Paul developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which allegedly led to Paul’s death on August 3, 2006.
On April 10, 2008, Strother served notices of depositions requesting that two of the defendants,…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re American Optical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Texaco, Inc. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Univar USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- In Re Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023
- In Re Rodney Cardell McGee v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023
- In Re Univar USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- In Re Univar USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.