Legal Opinion

Cavasos v. Gonzales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Cameron. Tried below before the Hon. E. Dougherty. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a trial of the right to certain one hundred and ninety-two sacks of wool, levied on by the plaintiff in error as the property of Panfilo Garcia, and claimed by the defendant in error. The result of the trial was a verdict in favor of Gonzales, the claimant, on which the court entered judgment. *134The case comes to us on error. Yarious exceptions were taken on the trial by counsel for plaintiff in .error, which will be noticed in their order.

First—That all the depositions should have been excluded; and the reason assigned is, that they were written in the Spanish language. The witnesses…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Loehde v. GlosIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Christman v. RayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Gregg & Co. v. FitzhughTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Mieritz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API