Legal Opinion

Case v. Knight

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1924No. 18468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

As alleged in his complaint as originally filed in this action, the plaintiff, Case, sought recovery from the defendant, Knight, upon, the theory that there was a balance due him for services rendered in pursuance of an employment contract entered into between them. "When the case came on for trial in the superior court for Clallam county, the plaintiff asked, and was *571by tbe court granted leave, to amend his complaint by alleging in substance that he was damaged by the defendant’s breach of the, employment contract; the allegations as to the making of the contract, its breach by the defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Buddress v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Daly v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Powelson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Barnes v. PackwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jellum v. Grays Harbor Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Cummings v. Guardianship ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. State Mortgage Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Cummings v. GSSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Deborah Burksfield v. LSI Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API