Legal Opinion

Bunker Hill Country Club v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1935No. 42005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

The motion for new trial is based upon the provision of the statute (Revenue Act 1928, § 413 (a) (1), 26 USCA § 872 (a) (1), which imposes a tax of “10 per centum of any amount paid — (1) As dues or membership fees to any social, athletic, or sporting club or organization, * * * ” and it is said that the dues taxed in this case were not paid to any club or organization but to the plaintiff corporation, which was not connected with any organization of the members except in a purely commercial way. This is contrary to the facts as to the matter of payment. The members in one sense…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wild Wing Lodge v. BlacklidgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Congressional Country Club v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century Sporting Club, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Engineer's Club of Philadelphia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  3. Engineer's Club of Philadelphia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API