Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Engineer's Club of Philadelphia v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 2, 1942No. 44568Published

1Concurrence

WHITAKER, Judge.

I concur in the result reached, but for different reasons.

I think the decision of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, holding that this taxpayer was not a social club, is res judicata in this proceeding and precludes us from inquiring whether or not it was in fact a social club. I think we are required to so hold by the decision of the Supreme Court in Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 289 U.S. 620, 623, 53 S.Ct. 706, 77 L.Ed. 1405. The testimony in this case is uncontradicted that the purposes and activities of the club in the year now before us…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Wourdack v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Munn v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. Bunker Hill Country Club v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API