Legal Opinion
Lesem v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1960No. Civ. 6158PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEA, J. pro tem. *
This is an action in declaratory relief to establish the plaintiff’s right to survivorship benefits in the San Diego County Employees’ Retirement Fund. Judgment was given for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff is the unremarried widow of Dr. Alex M. Lesem, deceased. In his lifetime Dr. Lesem served as County Health Officer for the County of San Diego from 1923 until August 1, 1949. On that date he was compelled to retire, having attained the mandatory retirement age of 70 years. He was a member of the County Employees’ Retirement Sys tem. Under the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Morrissey v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- San Bernardino Fire & Police Protective League v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.