Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 18, 2012No. C.A. 05-023-RGAPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, District Judge:
This memorandum opinion considers a motion for summary judgment (D.I. 790) brought by Dow Chemical Canada, Inc. and The Dow Chemical Company (collectively “Dow”). This motion attacks HRD Corporation’s remaining counterclaims for contractual ownership of two Dow patent applications, U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2006/0199897 and 2008/0306217 (the “'897 Application” and the “'217 Application”), and for misappropriation of trade secrets.
The facts and procedural history of this case are well-known to the parties. Dow and HRD contracted to jointly develop…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Randy v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Azur v. Chase Bank, USA, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Avatex Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Accenture Global Services GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Big Vision Private Ltd. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- In re Fca U.S. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Brinker v. McCaslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.