Legal Opinion
Brinker v. McCaslin
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided October 20, 2023No. 125657PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
No. 125,657 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STEVEN K. BRINKER and CUSTOM SPECIALTIES, LLC, Appellants, V. ROBERT J. MCCASLIN et al., Defendants, and JACK MUHLSTEIN, SPROUT CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, and AccEss ASIA USA, LLC, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Civil conspiracy is a way to hold a conspirator directly liable for damages caused by an unlawful act of a co-conspirator committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. Any act done by any conspirator in furtherance of the common design and in accordance with the general plan becomes the act of all, and each conspirator is responsible…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Chester A. Fisher v. Lenus Shamburg, Bill Howell, and Charles W. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- York v. InTrust Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Haarslev, Inc. v. Tom's Metal Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025