Legal Opinion

Dixon v. . Hooker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

The law with respect to the title by which Mrs. Gertrude II. Coward took the personal property given and bequeathed to her by her husband, H. L. Coward, deceased, by Item 2 of his last will and testament, is stated in the opinion of this Court in Jordan v. Sigmon, 194 N. C., 707, 140 S. E., 620. Speaking of Item 2 of the last will and testament of M. D. Sigmon, involved in that case, which is almost identical in language with Item 2 of the last will and testament of H. L. Coward, involved in the instant ease, Stacy, G. J., says:

“It will be observed that there is no residuary clause in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. James v. Bagley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Chewning v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Roane v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Roberts v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Rogers' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Smith v. Trustees of the Baptist OrphanageSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Britt v. . Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Quickel v. QuickelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In Re the Estate of BulisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API