Legal Opinion

The United States v. Emmett Earl Fulford, Anthony J. Sanner. Appeal of Emmett Earl Fulford

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 1987No. 86-3615PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas corpus proceeding, we conclude that petitioner has failed to establish his numerous claims for relief. We decide that certain omissions from the Rule 11 colloquy on the petitioner’s guilty plea were not serious enough to require vacation of sentence. Similarly, his charges of ineffective assistance of counsel do not demonstrate prejudice. We further determine that the Interstate Agreement on De-tainers Act was not violated when federal authorities took petitioner from the county jail, where he was being held as a probation violator, to the district court for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. David D. SchoolcraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. McAleese v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Ralph E. Lovett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Walter EspositoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. The United States v. Peter Huff, John James Davis. Appeal of Peter HuffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API