Legal Opinion

Re Application of Sherretz

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1953No. 2947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner sought a writ of quo warranto demanding that respondent appear and show cause by what authority she claimed to hold and exercise the office of personnel director of the City and County of Honolulu; petitioner claimed he was appointed and qualified to hold such office on July 1, 1939, entered upon the duties thereof, and still holds the said office.

In her answer respondent admitted that the petitioner-appellee was appointed and qualified as director of personnel in 1939 and held the said office, but alleged he was dismissed by action of the appointing authority in December, 1951,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Sheehan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Oliver v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. Ex parte WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Territory Ex Rel. Sylva v. MoritaHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. CayetanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. CayetanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API